DG was the Sergeant in charge of supervising the financial crimes unit
of a law enforcement agency with countywide jurisdiction. After a lengthy
investigation DG was fired, arrested, and charged with engaging in an
organized scheme to defraud a ninety-three year old man of nearly $100,000,
along with 23 other related felony offenses. The State alleged that, after
DG was initially called out to investigate a theft at the elderly victim’s
home, he began a visiting the man several times each week in order establish
a friendship and gain the man’s trust. The State alleged that over
the next several months DG stole over $80,000 in cash, and approximately
$20,000 worth of valuable collectible items from the victim’s home
and safety deposit box. During the course of the alleged scheme, law enforcement
became suspicious of DG’s activities and began following him. Ultimately,
DG’s supervisors because suspicious of his activities and, with
the victim’s consent, installed covert cameras in and around the
victim’s home in hopes of catching DG in the act of stealing money.
Eventually, law enforcement did obtain video footage of DG removing a
large stack of cash from a hidden safe on the victim’s bookshelf.
Law enforcement also obtained DG’s bank records, which showed that
during the course of the investigation, DG had deposited tens of thousands
of dollars in cash into his bank account. Additionally, law enforcement
obtained an insurance ledger which listed all of the valuable items contained
in the elderly victim’s safety deposit box. On the same three days
that DG was captured on bank surveillance footage carrying a large black
case into the safety deposit box room, law enforcement learned that DG
had pawned items listed on the ledger at various pawn shops within minutes
of leaving the bank where the elderly victim’s safety deposit box
was kept. When confronted with the evidence, DG offered a full detailed
video-taped confession, which was played at his trial. Notwithstanding
all this evidence, Attorney Prince was able to get four of the charges
dismissed and obtain a NOT GUILTY verdict on eighteen of the charges.
The jury hung on two of the charges, but the State, having been thoroughly
beaten and embarrassed, dropped those charges following the trial.